Observation Center
Phase 6Before AI performs work, it must understand how experts work. Every connector is read-only, every action is append-only, and no automation is ever created directly from an observation.
Sessions observed
41
trailing 90 days
Actions captured
1,284
append-only, evidence-linked
Patterns above threshold
6 of 7
≥5 observations, ≥2 coordinators
Candidates awaiting approval
4
routed to Assistant only
Automations created from observation
0
by design — human approval required
Live workflow sessions
812 Ridgeline Dr · TX-2041
OBS-1041 · M. Alvarez · Title Commitment Review
Read-only CRM connector · started Today 08:14 · 27 actions · 2 questions
44 Marsh Ln · TX-2039
OBS-1042 · D. Okafor · Curative
Email/SMS mirror · started Today 09:02 · 18 actions · 4 questions
1907 Belden Ave · TX-2033
OBS-1043 · R. Chen · Closing Scheduling
Document event stream · started Today 10:31 · 12 actions · 0 questions
6 Quarry Rd · TX-2028
OBS-1044 · S. Patel · Earnest Money Verification
Screen-share session · started Yesterday 15:20 · 41 actions · 6 questions
330 Sable Ct · TX-2012
OBS-1045 · M. Alvarez · Funded → Recorded
Read-only CRM connector · started Closed 12 Jul · 96 actions · 3 questions
Questions raised
Why was the servicer contacted by fax rather than portal?
Q-71 · OBS-1042 · TX-2039
Awaiting coordinatorWas skipping the buyer-agent confirmation intentional policy or file-specific?
Q-72 · OBS-1044 · TX-2028
Awaiting coordinatorIs the curative-first rule state-specific?
Q-73 · OBS-1041 · TX-2041
Answered — file-specific, easement onlyWas the 5-day insurance binder gap avoidable?
Q-74 · OBS-1045 · TX-2012
Awaiting coordinatorObserved transactions
| transaction | type | coordinator | stages observed | actions | exceptions | outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TX-2041 | Traditional purchase | M. Alvarez | 6/11 | 27 | 1 | In flight |
| TX-2039 | Subject-to | D. Okafor | 8/11 | 63 | 3 | In flight |
| TX-2033 | Wholesale assignment | R. Chen | 9/11 | 48 | 0 | In flight |
| TX-2028 | Double close | S. Patel | 7/11 | 71 | 4 | In flight |
| TX-2012 | Seller financing | M. Alvarez | 11/11 | 96 | 2 | Closed |
| TX-1994 | Novation | D. Okafor | 11/11 | 88 | 5 | Closed |
Action timeline — append-only
source systems never modifieddocuments
Title commitment v2
communications
—
dependencies
Commitment received
decision
Escalate to curative before ordering survey
reason
Stated: survey cost is wasted if easement kills the lot line
result
Curative task opened
evidence
Commitment PDF page 4 · CRM task 90124
source
Read-only CRM connector
Expert patterns
≥5 obs · ≥2 coordinatorsResolve Schedule B-II exceptions before ordering survey.
Document ordering
17 observations · 3 coordinators · 94% success · 2.4d median saving · 89% conf
Verify EM receipt at escrow source, never via forwarded copy.
Earnest money
22 observations · 4 coordinators · 100% success · saving unknown · 93% conf
Send lender status request Tuesday morning, not Friday afternoon.
Communication timing
31 observations · 4 coordinators · 81% success · 1.1d median saving · 84% conf
Reserve notary before clear-to-close on out-of-area signings.
Closing preparation
9 observations · 2 coordinators · 89% success · 0.8d median saving · 72% conf
Escalate to loan-officer manager after 2 unanswered condition requests.
Lender follow-up
12 observations · 3 coordinators · 75% success · 3.2d median saving · 70% conf
Schedule re-inspection while repair invoice is still pending.
Inspection coordination
3 observations · 1 coordinators · 100% success · saving unknown · 41% conf
Open curative task at commitment review rather than at cure deadline.
Exception handling
14 observations · 3 coordinators · 86% success · 4d median saving · 87% conf
Decision intelligence
Escalate curative before survey order
Commitment exception on lot-line easement
inputsCommitment v2 · Prior survey absent
reasonSurvey cost wasted if easement moves the lot line
outcomeSurvey deferred, $625 not spent
alternatives observedOrder survey immediately (observed 4×)
evidence ACT-88121 · 90% conf
Pad payoff good-through +4 days
Subject-to with slow servicer
inputsServicer SLA history · Scheduled close date
reasonServicer reissues take 3 business days
outcomeNo reissue needed
alternatives observedRequest exact-date payoff (observed 11×)
evidence ACT-88130 · 89% conf
Skip buyer-agent EM confirmation
Double close, escrow already responsive
inputsEscrow direct receipt
reasonnot stated — not inferred
outcomeNo downstream issue
alternatives observedRun playbook step 4 (observed 19×)
evidence ACT-88155 · 71% conf
Exception intelligence
| trigger | reason | action taken | outcome | freq | playbook? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payoff expires before scheduled closing | Servicer reissue latency | Request +4 day good-through window | 88% of expirations eliminated | 29 | Pending approval |
| Seller is a trust with successor trustee | Trust certification not in file | Request certification at intake, not at signing | Avg 3.1 days saved | 11 | Approved as module |
| Buyer-agent forwarded EM receipt | Chain-of-custody concern | Verify direct with escrow | Zero fraud incidents in observed window | 22 | Pending approval |
| HOA estoppel delayed past 10 days | not stated | Escalate to HOA management company principal | Mixed — 6 of 9 resolved within 48h | 9 | Pending approval |
| Municipal lien search returns open permit | not stated | Coordinate seller-side permit closeout | Observed twice, outcome varies | 2 | Insufficient sample |
Knowledge candidates — approval queue
4 awaiting human approvalInsert 'curative before survey' gate at commitment review.
KC-601 · Traditional purchase
17 observations · 94% success · 1 exceptions · 89% conf
coverage 17/21 · routed to Assistant only
EM verification must originate from escrow of record.
KC-602 · All deal types
22 observations · 100% success · 0 exceptions · 93% conf
coverage 22/24 · routed to Assistant only
Payoff requests default to good-through +4 business days.
KC-603 · Subject-to
29 observations · 88% success · 3 exceptions · 90% conf
coverage 29/31 · routed to Assistant only
Lender condition requests batched Tuesday 09:00.
KC-604 · Traditional purchase
31 observations · 81% success · 6 exceptions · 84% conf
coverage 31/44 · routed to Assistant only
Reserve notary before clear-to-close on out-of-area signings.
KC-605 · Double close
9 observations · 89% success · 1 exceptions · 72% conf
coverage 9/15 · routed to Assistant only
Insufficient sample — no candidate generated for re-inspection timing.
KC-606 · Novation
3 observations · 100% success · 0 exceptions · 41% conf
coverage 3/12 · routed to Assistant only
Shadow learning
observation onlyObservation only — AI predicts the next action and never performs it.
412 predictions logged
412 predictions across 6 transactions · 86% conf
318 timed predictions · 77% conf
87 corrections logged · 90% conf
58 predictions lacked an observable input · 81% conf
Only 9 exception predictions — below threshold · 30% conf
human corrections
predicted Order survey → actual Open curative task
M. Alvarez · Model missed easement dependency.
predicted Email buyer agent for EM → actual Email escrow directly
S. Patel · Source-of-truth rule not yet learned.
predicted Schedule signing → actual Reserve notary first
R. Chen · Sequencing preference, out-of-area file.
CRM connector framework
read-onlyFollow Up Boss
Connectedobserves: Transaction changes · Task completion · Status changes
access Read-only · writes None · last event Today 10:44
Dotloop
Connectedobserves: Document events · Signature events
access Read-only · writes None · last event Today 10:31
Google Workspace mirror
Connectedobserves: Communications · Calendar deadlines
access Read-only · writes None · last event Today 10:52
Qualia
Pending approvalobserves: Title milestones · Closing documents
access Read-only · writes None · last event —
SkySlope
Not configuredobserves: —
access Read-only · writes None · last event —
No writes. No automation. No mutation of external systems.
Expert comparison
anonymized · advisory| coordinator | workflow difference | median stage hrs | exception handling | communication | playbook usage | observed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coordinator A | Curative-first on title exceptions | 26 | Escalates early, documents reason | Written, batched | 91% | 21 |
| Coordinator B | Parallel lender + title tracks | 31 | Waits for servicer SLA, then escalates | Phone-first, logged after | 78% | 18 |
| Coordinator C | Signing logistics front-loaded | 24 | Rare deviations | SMS for scheduling, email for record | 95% | 16 |
| Coordinator D | Source-verification heavy | 29 | Deviates when source of truth is available | Written, immediate | 72% | 14 |
Comparisons are organizational-playbook inputs only. Individuals are anonymized and never publicly ranked.
Knowledge coverage
Lease option, land, commercial, hybrid unobserved.
Recorded and post-close stages thinly observed.
Bankruptcy and probate exceptions unobserved.
Commercial and HOA packages missing.
Fax observed indirectly only.
Three playbooks have no observed execution.
knowledge gaps — unknown remains unknown
- No observed commercial purchase execution — playbook remains unvalidated.
- Probate and bankruptcy exception handling has zero observations.
- Post-recording follow-through observed on 2 files only.
- Timing data for fax-based servicers is inferred from document events, not observed directly.
Replay learning
candidates onlySeller-financing note reviewed before escrow opening.
Critical decisionTX-2012 · evidence ACT-77120 · note draft v1 · learning candidate generated
Insurance binder waited 5 days on a single unanswered email.
DelayTX-2012 · evidence Email thread 3102 · learning candidate generated
Novation consent obtained in writing before marketing.
Best practiceTX-1994 · evidence Consent PDF · doc event 71002 · learning candidate generated
Payoff could have been requested 6 days earlier without cost.
Missed opportunityTX-1994 · evidence Payoff timestamps vs. escrow open · learning candidate generated
Trust certification obtained at signing; intake path was available.
Exception pathTX-2012 · evidence EXC-52 precedent · no candidate — insufficient basis
TC Pros owns
TC Pros does not own
All connectors are read-only and append-only. No automation is created directly from observation; Assistant remains the sole orchestrator.