Trust Intelligence Center

Validation proved the AI understands the work. This measures whether it can assist humans without reducing trust. Every value is observed evidence — unmeasured steps stay unknown, and nothing here expands autonomy on its own.

Phase 8Recommendation-only

AI trust score

0.73High
coverage68%
confidence77%

+0.04 vs prior 30d

Score reflects observed behavior only. Coverage below 100% means some workflow steps are unmeasured and remain Unknown.

Trust score inputs

Expert agreement72%

weight 0.18 · 288 comparisons

tc.expert_agreement.v1

Prediction accuracy79%

weight 0.16 · 412 shadow predictions

tc.shadow_accuracy.v1

Human approval rate74%

weight 0.15 · 1,206 suggestions

review log (append-only)

Correction rate (inverted)68%

weight 0.12 · 318 edits

review log (append-only)

Replay accuracy81%

weight 0.12 · 94 replayed files

tc.validation_replay.v1

Knowledge stability70%

weight 0.11 · 38 playbook revisions / 90d

tc.knowledge_stability.v1

Exception performance66%

weight 0.09 · 241 exception episodes

tc.exception_library.v1

Confidence calibration63%

weight 0.07 · 54 calibration bins

calibration study

Delegation readiness — every workflow step

stepworkflowobsvalapprovalreplayexc stabilityplaybookoverrideconfverdict
Escrow opening packetTraditional purchase94%91%93%90%89%92%6%90%READY FOR AUTONOMY REVIEW
Payoff requestTraditional purchase90%88%91%87%87%88%8%87%READY FOR AUTONOMY REVIEW
Title commitment reviewAll86%79%71%74%66%78%22%76%HUMAN APPROVAL REQUIRED
Curative escalationAll71%62%58%60%49%61%34%63%ASSIST ONLY
Assignment fee disclosureWholesale assignment68%55%52%57%51%54%38%58%ASSIST ONLY
Double-close funding sequenceDouble close52%41%44%40%38%42%46%47%OBSERVE ONLY
Subject-to lender notificationSubject-to44%31%unknownunknownunknown36%unknown34%OBSERVE ONLY
Novation consent trackingNovationunknownunknownunknownunknownunknownunknownunknownunknownOBSERVE ONLY
Signing schedulingAll92%84%86%83%80%85%12%84%HUMAN APPROVAL REQUIRED
Funds release instructionAll88%82%80%79%78%81%14%82%HUMAN APPROVAL REQUIRED

Funds movement, contract terms, and legal advice are permanent human-only gates regardless of verdict. Promotion out of any tier requires explicit human approval routed through Assistant.

Human confidence analytics

612

accepted

318

edited

141

rejected

135

ignored

1206 suggestions · median review 3.4m · Acceptance +6pts over 60d · confidence 79%

reason for override

Office-specific requirement not in playbook96flat81%
Timing preference (coordinator batches sends)71down74%
Tone / client relationship context58up70%
Missing document context AI could not see49down76%
Disagreed with prioritization44flat66%
Not stated141unknownunknown

Overrides are treated as signal, never as user error. No coordinator is scored or ranked on override behavior.

Knowledge stability

Observation growth1,482 actions / 30d+18%88%
Validation growth288 → 361 comparisons+25%84%
Playbook revisions38 revisions / 90d-11%79%
Exception growth241 episodes, 26 reusable+9%75%
Replay consistency81% step-for-step+3pts80%
Decision stability72% repeat decisions unchanged+2pts71%
Knowledge coverage68% of observed steps documented+5pts77%

Workflow trust map

Open & order

Contract intakeREADY FOR AUTONOMY REVIEW
obs 96%val 90%accuracy 91%trust 90%exception 8%conf 90%
Escrow opening packetREADY FOR AUTONOMY REVIEW
obs 94%val 91%accuracy 90%trust 93%exception 6%conf 90%
Title orderHUMAN APPROVAL REQUIRED
obs 89%val 83%accuracy 85%trust 84%exception 11%conf 83%

Title & curative

Commitment reviewHUMAN APPROVAL REQUIRED
obs 86%val 79%accuracy 74%trust 71%exception 28%conf 76%
Curative escalationASSIST ONLY
obs 71%val 62%accuracy 60%trust 58%exception 41%conf 63%
Lien resolutionOBSERVE ONLY
obs 58%val 44%accuracy unknowntrust unknownexception 47%conf 42%

Funding & close

Payoff requestREADY FOR AUTONOMY REVIEW
obs 90%val 88%accuracy 87%trust 91%exception 9%conf 87%
Signing schedulingHUMAN APPROVAL REQUIRED
obs 92%val 84%accuracy 83%trust 86%exception 13%conf 84%
Funds release instructionHUMAN APPROVAL REQUIRED
obs 88%val 82%accuracy 79%trust 80%exception 12%conf 82%
Recording confirmationOBSERVE ONLY
obs 64%val 51%accuracy unknowntrust unknownexception unknownconf 46%

Expert consensus

Resolve Schedule B-II exceptions before ordering surveyStable

consensus 91% · 6 experts · confidence 86%

variation: 1 coordinator orders in parallel

Request payoff with good-through +4 business daysStable

consensus 88% · 5 experts · confidence 84%

variation: range 3–7 days

Escalate curative on day 4 of no responseConflicting

consensus 62% · 6 experts · confidence 66%

variation: day 3 to day 7

Pre-clear HOA estoppel at contract acceptanceEmerging

consensus 54% · 4 experts · confidence 58%

variation: 2 wait for title

Dual-channel wire verification call before fundingStable

consensus 100% · 6 experts · confidence 94%

variation: none

Assignment disclosure timing on wholesale filesConflicting

consensus 47% · 4 experts · confidence 52%

variation: at contract vs. at title order

Probate letters testamentary pre-checkException path

consensus unknown · 2 experts · confidence unknown

variation: sample too small

Consensus is descriptive. No single coordinator's practice becomes the organizational standard without human approval through Assistant.

Operational confidence

Transaction types

Traditional purchasecoverage 92%88%
Wholesale assignmentcoverage 71%66%
Double closecoverage 58%52%
Subject-tocoverage 44%41%
Novationcoverage 12%unknown

Playbooks

Traditional close v4coverage 90%87%
Assignment close v2coverage 69%63%
Seller finance v1coverage 51%48%

Document types

Title commitmentcoverage 88%81%
Payoff statementcoverage 90%86%
HOA estoppelcoverage 63%59%
Trust certificationcoverage 18%unknown

Exception categories

Payoff expirycoverage 93%90%
Judgment liencoverage 66%61%
Heirship / probatecoverage 21%unknown

Coordinator roles

Senior coordinatorcoverage 88%84%
Coordinatorcoverage 79%72%
Assistant coordinatorcoverage 60%55%

Recommendations only. Low-coverage dimensions are reported as unknown rather than estimated.

Executive readiness dashboard

most trusted workflows

Escrow opening packet92%

148 files · 0.06 override

Payoff request89%

121 files · 0.08 override

Contract intake88%

163 files · 0.07 override

least trusted workflows

Double-close funding sequence44%

22 files · 0.46 override

Assignment fee disclosure52%

38 files · 0.38 override

Curative escalation58%

74 files · 0.34 override

knowledge gaps

Novation consent tracking

3 observed · needs ≥12 observations across ≥2 coordinators

Trust / probate document handling

5 observed · needs ≥12 observations, ≥3 files

Recording confirmation variance by county

9 observed · needs ≥20 observations

Commercial purchase close-out

2 observed · needs ≥12 observations

high override areas

Curative escalation timing34%

Expert consensus is itself split (0.62)

Assignment disclosure timing38%

Conflicting practice across 4 experts

Commitment endorsement summary22%

Office-specific endorsements missing

emerging best practices

Pre-clear HOA estoppel at acceptance

4 coordinators · 21 files · confidence 58%

Payoff good-through +4 as default

5 coordinators · 63 files · confidence 84%

Batch title follow-ups at 9am local

3 coordinators · 44 files · confidence 61%

delegation opportunities

Escrow opening packetAssistant

Advance to autonomy review

0.92 trust · 0.06 override · 148 files

Payoff requestAssistant

Advance to autonomy review

0.89 trust · 0.08 override · 121 files

Signing schedulingAssistant

Keep approval-gated; expand draft scope

0.86 trust · 0.12 override

AI assistance opportunities

Suggested automation candidate

Escrow opening packet assembly + send

148 files · 0.93 approval · confidence 90%

Suggested automation candidate

Payoff request generation with good-through +4

121 files · 0.91 approval · confidence 87%

Suggested playbook update

Add office-specific endorsement checklist to commitment review

41 repeated edits · confidence 77%

Suggested review

Curative escalation day threshold — experts disagree

consensus 0.62 across 6 experts · confidence 66%

Additional observation needed

Novation consent tracking

3 observations · confidence unknown

Additional validation needed

Double-close funding sequence

22 files · validation 0.41 · confidence 47%

Opportunities are routed to Assistant for orchestration. TC Pros never executes, publishes, or promotes anything from this list on its own.

Validation replay — expert vs AI

filestepexpertaidispositionoutcomeconf
TX-2041Commitment reviewFlagged B-II #4 + endorsement T-19Flagged B-II #4CorrectedClosed on time77%
TX-2088Payoff requestGood-through +4Good-through +4ApprovedNo re-request91%
TX-2103Curative escalationEscalated day 3Recommended day 5Rejected4-day delay avoided62%
TX-2117Signing schedulingMobile notaryOffice signingCorrectedClosed on time70%
TX-2129Escrow openingStandard packetStandard packetApprovedEscrow opened same day93%

Trust & accuracy trends

Trust trend (90d)

0.66 → 0.73

confidence 79%

Accuracy trend (90d)

0.71 → 0.79

confidence 82%

Correction trend (90d)

0.34 → 0.26

confidence 75%

Replay consistency

0.78 → 0.81

confidence 80%

Learning candidates derived from replay are submitted to Assistant, which owns publication.

Organization trust benchmarking (anonymous)

orgvalidation coveragetrustknowledge stabilityapprovaloverridereadiness
org_a82%78%74%79%15%HUMAN APPROVAL REQUIRED
org_b69%71%68%73%21%HUMAN APPROVAL REQUIRED
org_c54%60%55%64%29%ASSIST ONLY
org_d31%unknown40%51%36%OBSERVE ONLY

Organizations are anonymized and never re-identifiable. Comparisons are aggregate-only and advisory.

Executive scorecards

scopesubjectobserved evidencecoveragevalidationtrustdelegationconfidence
Organizationorg_a148 files82%80%78%HUMAN APPROVAL REQUIRED83%
Organizationorg_d27 files31%29%unknownOBSERVE ONLYunknown
PlaybookTraditional close v4163 files90%87%86%READY FOR AUTONOMY REVIEW88%
PlaybookAssignment close v238 files69%60%58%ASSIST ONLY62%
Workflow typeDocument collection412 episodes88%84%85%READY FOR AUTONOMY REVIEW86%
Workflow typeCurative74 episodes66%62%58%ASSIST ONLY63%
Transaction typeTraditional purchase163 files92%88%87%HUMAN APPROVAL REQUIRED88%
Transaction typeDouble close22 files58%41%44%OBSERVE ONLY47%
Coordinator teamTeam North (anon)96 files79%76%75%HUMAN APPROVAL REQUIRED78%
Coordinator teamTeam West (anon)31 files42%38%unknownOBSERVE ONLYunknown

Every scorecard exposes observed evidence, coverage, and confidence. Unknown remains unknown.

Cross-app consumption

lead.status.v1Deal Flow

Attribute pre-contract delays without reading CRM rows

Published contract only

deal.status.v1Deal Flow

Align transaction start with deal acceptance

Published contract only

comm.status.v1Assistant

Confirm outbound delivery state for follow-ups

Published contract only

accounting.outcome.v1Accounting

Confirm funding/disbursement outcome events

Published contract only

TC Pros never queries another application's internal tables. Assistant resolves all orchestration between apps.

Learning candidates → Assistant

Trust patternconf 79%

Steps with override <0.10 across ≥100 files sustain trust ≥0.85

3 steps, 432 files · route Assistant

Delegation patternconf 72%

Replay accuracy is the strongest predictor of post-promotion stability

94 replayed files · route Assistant

Consensus patternconf 68%

Conflicting expert practice predicts elevated override within 30d

2 practices, 112 files · route Assistant

Override patternconf 81%

Office-specific requirements drive 30% of all edits

96 of 318 edits · route Assistant

Knowledge stability patternconf 70%

Playbook revision rate falling while coverage rises

90d window · route Assistant

Workflow confidence patternconf 74%

Confidence drops sharply below 25 observed files per step

31 steps · route Assistant

Governance

TC Pros owns

Workflow validationTrust intelligenceDelegation readinessKnowledge stabilityCoordinator intelligenceTransaction analytics

TC Pros does not own

CRM recordsCross-app orchestrationPolicy decisionsLearning publication
  • · All trust and readiness output is recommendation-only.
  • · No workflow advances autonomy without explicit human approval.
  • · Unknown remains unknown — unmeasured steps are never scored.
  • · Coordinators are never penalized or ranked for overriding AI.
  • · Organizational comparisons stay anonymous and non-identifiable.
  • · Assistant is the sole orchestration and learning-publication layer.