Transaction Performance Center
Phase 15Phase 15 measures how effectively the whole transaction organization performs. Everything is advisory: nothing executes closings, updates transaction records, or moves money.
Transaction performance
0.81
11 observed operational measures, 180d
Closing performance
median 33.4d
212 recorded closings, contract-to-recorded
Coordinator performance
7 coordinators
observed workload only — never ranked
Partner performance
7 classes
observed interaction timestamps
Portfolio performance
9 portfolios
evidence-backed operational grouping
Capacity performance
0.87 utilization
observed queue + assignment records
Executive priorities
8 ranked
risk + opportunity queue, evidence-linked
Optimization matrix
12 transactions
certified files with observed stability
Enterprise transaction portfolio — operational grouping
| portfolio | files | observed | certification health | trend | coverage | conf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Healthy Closings | 46 | no open blockers, all dependencies resolved | CERTIFIED 44 / 46 | improving | 94% | 88% |
| Stable Transactions | 38 | ≤1 exception each, milestones on observed schedule | CERTIFIED 33 / 38 | flat | 90% | 84% |
| High Performing | 21 | closing duration below observed median by ≥6d | CERTIFIED 21 / 21 | improving | 92% | 86% |
| Needs Review | 17 | open review items older than 5d | CERTIFIED_WITH_CONDITIONS 12 / 17 | worsening | 81% | 72% |
| Revalidation Required | 12 | material change recorded after certification | REVALIDATION_PENDING 12 / 12 | flat | 83% | 74% |
| Coordinator Risk | 9 | queue length above observed working range | mixed | worsening | 76% | 68% |
| Partner Risk | 14 | outstanding partner requests >72h | mixed | worsening | 66% | 62% |
| Capacity Risk | 11 | pool backlog growth over 3 consecutive weeks | mixed | flat | 72% | 66% |
| Unknown | 7 | insufficient observed evidence to classify | unknown | unknown | unknown | unknown |
Closing performance is never fabricated. Files without sufficient observed evidence stay in the Unknown portfolio.
Closing performance — observed evidence only
| measure | observed | trend | n | conf |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observed closing duration | median 33.4d; p90 51.8d contract-to-recorded | improving | 212 | 85% |
| Milestone completion | 88% of recorded milestones have completion evidence | flat | 1684 | 82% |
| Document readiness | median 2.6d from request to received-and-legible | improving | 934 | 79% |
| Dependency resolution | median 5.3d across 12 dependency classes | worsening | 318 | 77% |
| Exception frequency | 1.11 exceptions per closing | improving | 212 | 80% |
| Revalidation frequency | 0.19 revalidations per certified file | flat | 164 | 75% |
| Observed delays | median 4.6d idle per file; 58% of cycle time | worsening | 212 | 78% |
| Post-signing recording lag | median 1.8d signing to recorded | flat | 148 | 71% |
| Funding confirmation lag | insufficient observed timestamps | unknown | 22 | unknown |
Completion is never inferred. A milestone without completion evidence stays incomplete, not assumed complete.
Coordinator performance — operational workload, never ranked
| coordinator | load | queue | chg | esc | rework | conf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coordinator A 12–16 concurrent files observed bottleneck: payoff statement waits | 14 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 79% |
Coordinator B 13–17 concurrent files observed bottleneck: title commitment follow-ups | 19 | 11 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 81% |
Coordinator C 10–15 concurrent files observed bottleneck: none observed | 11 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 77% |
Coordinator D 12–16 concurrent files observed bottleneck: inspection scheduling | 16 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 74% |
Coordinator E 9–13 concurrent files observed bottleneck: none observed | 9 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 72% |
Coordinator F 11–15 concurrent files observed bottleneck: lender condition loops | 13 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 70% |
Coordinator G insufficient observation window bottleneck: unknown | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | unknown |
Coordinators are never ranked by personal performance. These are observed operational workload signals used for capacity conversations only.
Partner performance — observed interactions, no reputation scores
| partner class | response | open | dep | docs | conf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Title companies commitment revisions on creative-finance structures | median 9.4h to first response | 14 | 88% | 84% | 80% |
Attorneys sub-to and novation review queues | median 21.6h to first response | 6 | 79% | 72% | 71% |
Lenders condition clearing before CD | median 15.1h to first response | 11 | 81% | 77% | 74% |
Inspectors scheduling in 2-day windows | median 6.2h to first response | 4 | 91% | 89% | 78% |
Insurance binder issuance on vacant properties | median 11.8h to first response | 5 | 85% | 80% | 70% |
Vendors HOA estoppel turnaround | median 18.3h to first response | 8 | 73% | 68% | 66% |
Municipal / recording unknown | insufficient observed interactions | 2 | unknown | unknown | unknown |
No reputation scores are produced. Only observed operational interactions with recorded timestamps are measured.
Playbook performance — advisory recommendations
| playbook | usage | success | rework | exceptions | missing steps | dependency issues | recommendation | conf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard purchase | 84 | 92% | 14% | 21% | none observed | payoff timing on 6 files | EXPAND | 86% |
| Wholesale assignment | 41 | 84% | 22% | 34% | assignment disclosure step skipped 4× | end-buyer proof of funds | REVIEW | 79% |
| Double close | 26 | 71% | 28% | 42% | second-leg funding checkpoint | transactional funding confirmation | REVIEW | 74% |
| Seller financing | 22 | 86% | 18% | 27% | none observed | note + deed of trust prep | OBSERVE | 72% |
| Sub-to | 17 | 76% | 31% | 44% | insurance rewrite checkpoint | lender notification handling | REVIEW | 68% |
| Novation | 12 | 70% | 33% | 48% | renovation scope sign-off | contractor schedule evidence | REVIEW | 63% |
| Lease option | 9 | 81% | 20% | 30% | none observed | option memorandum recording | OBSERVE | 60% |
| Land | 14 | 88% | 15% | 22% | none observed | survey turnaround | EXPAND | 71% |
| Commercial | 6 | unknown | unknown | unknown | unknown | unknown | UNKNOWN | unknown |
| Hybrid creative | 5 | unknown | unknown | unknown | unknown | unknown | UNKNOWN | unknown |
Playbook recommendations are advisory. A playbook below the observation threshold returns UNKNOWN rather than a recommendation.
Portfolio performance
Portfolio stability
flat84% of files with no owner or scope change in 14d
Portfolio throughput
improving38 closings recorded in trailing 30d
Transaction mix
flat48% purchase, 22% wholesale, 30% creative structures
Capacity utilization
worsening0.87 of observed working range across 7 coordinators
Closing readiness
improving71% of active files hold complete readiness evidence
Certification health
flat164 certified, 17 conditional, 12 revalidation pending
Portfolio expansion signal
unknowninsufficient periods to conclude
Capacity performance — no automatic reassignment
Purchase pool
backlog 93 coordinators, 42 observed slots
queue growth +4 files / 14d · even within observed range · constraints: none observed
Creative finance pool
backlog 142 coordinators, 26 observed slots
queue growth +7 files / 14d · uneven — one queue above range · constraints: attorney review dependency
Wholesale pool
backlog 61 coordinator, 15 observed slots
queue growth +2 files / 14d · single-owner concentration · constraints: no observed backup owner
Commercial / land pool
backlog 31 coordinator, 12 observed slots
queue growth flat · even · constraints: survey vendor turnaround
Overflow pool
backlog 4unassigned
queue growth unknown · unknown · constraints: unknown
No automatic reassignment occurs. Capacity signals are advisory inputs for a human staffing decision.
Process performance — append-only stage records
| stage | duration | dependency delay | approval delay | exceptions | revalidation | completion | conf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accepted → opened | median 0.9d | 0.3d | 0.1d | 6% | 0% | 98% | 87% |
| Earnest money | median 2.1d | 1.2d | 0.4d | 11% | 2% | 95% | 84% |
| Title ordered → commitment | median 6.4d | 3.8d | 0.6d | 24% | 5% | 90% | 82% |
| Inspection window | median 7.2d | 2.9d | 1.4d | 19% | 4% | 92% | 80% |
| Financing / funding evidence | median 9.8d | 5.6d | 2.1d | 31% | 9% | 86% | 77% |
| Clear to close | median 3.6d | 1.7d | 1.1d | 17% | 8% | 89% | 79% |
| Signing → recorded | median 1.8d | 0.6d | 0.3d | 7% | 1% | 94% | 81% |
| Post-close package | insufficient observations | unknown | unknown | unknown | unknown | unknown | unknown |
Process performance records are append-only. Corrections are added as new observations, never overwrites.
Operational bottleneck intelligence
Repeated document delay
RECURRINGpayoff statement + HOA estoppel requested twice on 29 files
Repeated funding delay
RECURRINGfunding evidence superseded before signing on 16 files
Repeated inspection delay
RECURRINGinspection rescheduled ≥1× on 21 files
Repeated approval delay
RECURRINGapproval requested and unacknowledged >48h on 23 files
Repeated dependency delay
RECURRINGcommitment → clear exceeded 7d on 44 files
Repeated coordinator escalation
EMERGINGescalation ledger entries on the same dependency class
Repeated insurance binder delay
EMERGINGbinder issued after clear-to-close on 7 files
Repeated recording rejection
UNKNOWN3 observed rejections — below threshold
Executive opportunity queue — recommendations only
Improve playbooks
76%double close and sub-to carry the highest observed rework
evidence: playbook performance table, n=43
advisory: fewer rework cycles on creative structures
Reduce bottlenecks
81%dependency delay accounts for 132 observed cost days
evidence: bottleneck ledger, 44 episodes
advisory: shorter commitment-to-clear window
Improve coordinator capacity
74%creative finance pool forecast utilization 0.96
evidence: capacity pools, 14 file backlog
advisory: staffing conversation before overflow
Reduce revalidation
70%0.19 revalidations per certified file
evidence: revalidation triggers, n=164
advisory: earlier material-change capture
Improve partner coordination
67%vendor dependency completion at 0.73
evidence: partner interactions, n=8 outstanding
advisory: fewer outstanding requests >72h
Optimize closing workflow
79%58% of observed cycle time is idle waiting
evidence: closing performance, n=212
advisory: reduced idle time per file
Improve Assistant coordination
65%cross-app requests observed to queue >24h
evidence: assistant request log, n=61
advisory: faster cross-app dependency resolution
Standardize document intake
72%same document requested twice on 29 files
evidence: document readiness records
advisory: fewer duplicate requests
Transaction trend intelligence
| series | window | direction | observed | n | conf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Closing throughput | 6 × 30d | improving | 29 → 38 recorded closings per period | 212 | 84% |
| Portfolio growth | 6 × 30d | improving | 142 → 175 active files | 175 | 86% |
| Coordinator capacity | 6 × 30d | worsening | utilization 0.74 → 0.87 | 7 | 73% |
| Playbook adoption | 6 × 30d | improving | 68% → 84% of files opened on a playbook | 236 | 80% |
| Partner stability | 6 × 30d | flat | median response time within ±1.2h band | 611 | 71% |
| Dependency health | 6 × 30d | worsening | median resolution 4.4d → 5.3d | 318 | 77% |
| Exception trends | 6 × 30d | improving | 1.34 → 1.11 exceptions per closing | 212 | 79% |
| Revalidation trends | 2 × 30d | unknown | insufficient periods to conclude | 24 | unknown |
A trend conclusion requires at least three observed periods. Shorter series stay unknown.
Predictive advisory — never modifies state
Likely closing delay on 6 creative-finance files
commitment age >7d + open attorney dependency
Likely capacity constraint in the creative finance pool
forecast utilization 0.96, backlog +7 / 14d
Likely partner delay from vendor class
8 outstanding requests, dependency completion 0.73
Likely dependency issue on transactional funding
second-leg funding checkpoint missing on 4 double closes
Likely revalidation on 5 certified files
material change recorded after certification version
Likely bottleneck recurrence: repeated document delay
29 episodes across 6 periods, no mitigation recorded
Recording rejection risk
3 observations — below prediction threshold
Predictions are advisory. They never modify transaction state, certification verdicts, or assignments.
Transaction change impact — evaluated before any governance change
| proposed change | tx | coord | partners | playbooks | contracts | assistant reqs | expected impact | conf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Require attorney sign-off on all sub-to files | 17 | 3 | 2 | 1 | tc.closing_performance.v1 · tc.partner_performance.v1 | 17 | advisory: adds an observed dependency of median 21.6h per file | 72% |
| Raise document readiness threshold to legible + complete | 175 | 7 | 6 | 10 | tc.transaction_performance.v1 · tc.transaction_performance_scorecards.v1 | 96 | advisory: more files enter Needs Review until evidence is re-collected | 70% |
| Reduce creative finance pool by one coordinator | 41 | 2 | 4 | 4 | tc.capacity_performance.v1 · tc.coordinator_performance.v1 | 24 | advisory: forecast utilization moves above the observed working range | 75% |
| Retire the hybrid creative playbook | 5 | 2 | 3 | 1 | tc.transaction_trends.v1 | 5 | unknown — usage below the observation threshold | unknown |
Transaction scenarios — advisory, no execution
Large closing volume (+30%)
HIGHcreative finance pool exceeds observed range within 11d
Coordinator absence (1 of 7, 10d)
MEDIUM9 files require a human reassignment decision; queue +6
Partner outage (primary title company)
HIGH14 files lose their commitment dependency path
Funding delay (transactional lender, 5d)
MEDIUM4 double closes shift past target close date
Regulatory change (new disclosure step)
MEDIUMall 10 playbooks gain one step; median +0.6d per file
Portfolio expansion (new market)
UNKNOWNunknown — no observed history in target market
Scenarios are modeled from observed history only. No scenario executes anything.
Executive performance queue
6 creative-finance files past commitment SLA
HIGHClosing risk · commitment age >7d, attorney dependency open
12 files pending revalidation
MEDIUMClosing risk · material change after certification version
One coordinator queue above observed range
MEDIUMCoordinator risk · queue 11 vs 13–17 concurrent observed range
Wholesale pool has no observed backup owner
MEDIUMCoordinator risk · single-owner concentration across 15 slots
Vendor dependency completion at 0.73
MEDIUMPartner risk · 8 outstanding requests, HOA estoppel turnaround
Creative finance pool forecast utilization 0.96
HIGHCapacity risk · backlog +7 files / 14d
58% of cycle time is observed idle waiting
HIGHOpportunity · closing performance, n=212
Duplicate document requests on 29 files
MEDIUMOptimization · document readiness records
Transaction replay — append-only
TX-2291 opened on standard purchase playbook
system (observed)
earnest money receipt evidence recorded
Coordinator C
title commitment requested; first response 8.1h
Title partner
queue length recorded at 4; no assignment change
Coordinator C
step 7 (payoff request) executed with evidence
Coordinator C
verdict CERTIFIED v3; coverage 0.91
Certification engine
payoff figure superseded; certification re-check queued
system (observed)
recorded 33d after contract; within observed median
system (observed)
Replay is append-only. Entries are never edited or removed.
Transaction calibration — predicted vs observed
| subject | predicted | observed | delta | n | conf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Closing readiness | 74% of active files ready by target | 71% ready by target | -3 pts | 212 | 81% |
| Capacity utilization | 0.84 pool utilization | 0.87 pool utilization | +0.03 | 7 | 73% |
| Bottleneck recurrence | 5 recurring bottlenecks | 5 recurring, 2 emerging | +2 emerging | 8 | 75% |
| Revalidation rate | 0.16 per certified file | 0.19 per certified file | +0.03 | 164 | 72% |
| Partner response time | median 12.4h | median 13.1h | +0.7h | 611 | 70% |
| Portfolio expansion | no prediction issued | insufficient observations | unknown | 4 | unknown |
Historical predictions are immutable. Calibration records compare them to later observations.
Transaction performance scorecards
Closings
median 33.4d duration; 88% milestone completion
n=212 closings
Coordinators
workload, queue and escalation counts — unranked
n=7 coordinators
Partners
response time and dependency completion by class
n=611 interactions
Playbooks
usage, success, rework and exception rates
n=236 playbook runs
Capacity
utilization 0.87; backlog 36 across 5 pools
n=5 pools
Portfolio
9 portfolios; 175 active files classified
n=175 files
Operations
stage duration and delay decomposition by stage
n=8 stages
Enterprise transaction performance
org rollup 0.81 across 11 measures
n=11 measures
Every scorecard exposes observed evidence, coverage, confidence and sample size. Missing evidence stays unknown.
Closing optimization matrix
| transaction | cert version | closing readiness | observed stability | capacity impact | optimization recommendation | conf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TX-2291 | v3 | READY | no scope change in 21d | low — 1 slot | Proceed on current playbook | 86% |
| TX-2274 | v2 | CONDITIONAL | 1 owner change recorded | medium — 2 slots | Close payoff evidence gap before signing | 77% |
| TX-2263 | v4 | BLOCKED | 3 exceptions reopened | high — escalation queue | Human review of attorney dependency path | 74% |
| TX-2258 | v1 | READY | stable since certification | low — 1 slot | Candidate for standard purchase template expansion | 82% |
| TX-2247 | v2 | CONDITIONAL | funding evidence superseded | medium | Revalidate funding before clear-to-close | 73% |
| TX-2239 | v3 | READY | no change in 14d | low | No action recommended | 80% |
| TX-2231 | v2 | BLOCKED | inspection rescheduled 2× | medium | Human scheduling decision required | 71% |
| TX-2226 | v5 | CONDITIONAL | commitment revised twice | high | Review sub-to insurance rewrite checkpoint | 69% |
| TX-2218 | v1 | READY | stable | low | No action recommended | 78% |
| TX-2209 | v3 | CONDITIONAL | HOA estoppel outstanding | medium | Escalate vendor dependency to human owner | 67% |
| TX-2204 | v2 | READY | stable | low | No action recommended | 79% |
| TX-2198 | v1 | UNKNOWN | insufficient observations | unknown | No recommendation — evidence incomplete | unknown |
Optimization recommendations are advisory. They never change certification verdicts or transaction state.
Cross-app consumption — published contracts only
Lead List
ll.pipeline_summary.v1expected inbound transaction volume
Deal Flow
df.deal_stage.v1pre-contract stage signals for portfolio mix
Connect
cn.partner_directory.v1partner class identity for interaction grouping
Inbox
ib.thread_activity.v1observed response timestamps only
Operations
ops.workload_summary.v1observed coordinator queue and assignment records
Accounting
acct.transaction_financials.v1the only approved source of financial values
Assistant
as.orchestration_request.v1cross-app request status and learning submission
Only published contracts are consumed. Internal application tables are never read. Financial values originate only from approved Accounting contracts.
Published Phase 15 contracts
tc.transaction_performance.v1
v1measure · observed · trend · n · coverage · confidence
tc.closing_performance.v1
v1transaction_id · closing_duration_days · milestone_completion · document_readiness · dependency_resolution_days · exceptions · revalidations · confidence
tc.coordinator_performance.v1
v1coordinator · workload · observed_capacity · queue · assignment_changes · escalations · rework · confidence · ranked
tc.partner_performance.v1
v1partner_class · response_time_hours · outstanding_requests · dependency_completion · document_readiness · confidence · reputation_score
tc.capacity_performance.v1
v1pool · capacity · backlog · queue_growth · forecast_utilization · constraints · confidence
tc.executive_transaction_performance.v1
v1item · category · evidence · severity · confidence
tc.transaction_trends.v1
v1series · periods · direction · observed · n · confidence
tc.transaction_performance_scorecards.v1
v1scorecard · observed · coverage · confidence · sample_size
Applications consume published contracts only.
Learning candidates — submitted through Assistant only
Closing performance patterns
Assistantidle wait dominates 58% of observed cycle time
Coordinator capacity patterns
Assistantqueue growth precedes escalation by median 6d
Partner coordination patterns
Assistantvendor requests unanswered >72h predict dependency slip
Playbook optimization patterns
Assistantmissing checkpoints correlate with rework on 43 runs
Transaction bottleneck patterns
Assistantdependency delay recurs across 6 observed periods
Enterprise transaction performance patterns
Assistantorg rollup stable across 11 measures
TC Pros never publishes organizational learning directly. Every candidate is submitted through Assistant.
Governance
TC Pros owns
TC Pros does not own
invariants
- · Everything advisory — nothing executes closings
- · No transaction record is updated
- · No money moves
- · Coordinators are never ranked personally
- · Partners never receive reputation scores
- · Records are append-only
- · Unknown remains unknown
- · Assistant remains the sole orchestrator